"To be 'Orwellian' is to speak with absolute clarity, to be succinct, to
explain what the event is, to talk about what triggers something
happening… and to do so without any pejorative whatsoever." - Frank Luntz
Is this really "Orwellian" or is this quote actually an excellent example of double "doublethink."
Doublethink:
Doublethink is the act of ordinary people simultaneously accepting two mutually contradictory beliefs as correct, often in distinct social contexts. Doublethink is related to, but differs from, hypocrisy and neutrality. Somewhat related but almost the opposite is cognitive dissonance, where contradictory beliefs cause conflict in one's mind. Doublethink is notable due to a lack of cognitive dissonance — thus the person is completely unaware of any conflict or contradiction.Or is it "Newspeak"? I'm so confused, which I think is the point of all of this "Luntzspeak."
George Orwell created the word doublethink in his dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984); doublethink is part of newspeak. In the novel, its origin within the typical citizen is unclear; while it could be partly a product of Big Brother's formal brainwashing programmes, the novel explicitly shows people learning Doublethink and newspeak due to peer pressure and a desire to "fit in", or gain status within the Party — to be seen as a loyal Party Member. In the novel, for someone to even recognize – let alone mention – any contradiction within the context of the Party line was akin to blasphemy, and could subject that someone to possible disciplinary action and to the instant social disapproval of fellow Party Members.
What would George Orwell think of all of this?
And what would he think of "Palinspeak"?
0 comments - Post a comment :
Post a Comment