George Takei is like a fine wine. He gets better and better with age. Live long and prosper, George.
Too many of the GOP presidential candidates are siding with Kim Davis. One of them could become president and take the oath swearing to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States". How can you preserve, protect and defend something you do not understand?
This post comes on the heels of outpouring support for Davis from
2016 GOP presidential candidates Huckabee, Ted Cruz, Rick Santorum, and
Bobby Jindal.
Huckabee’s campaign reportedly organized the rally for Davis, and Huckabee said he would be willing to go to jail for the Kentucky clerk.
“I’m tired of seeing people just harassed because they believe
something of their faith,” Huckabee said to reporters at the Tuesday
rally. “We cannot criminalize Christian faith or anybody’s faith in this
country.”
Cruz thanked God after Davis’ release was announced, tweeting that it
was “Outrageous she was jailed 6 days for living according to her
Christian faith.”
Santorum also tweeted support for Davis, saying “we should not have to choose between keeping our job and practicing our faith.”
Santorum called Davis heroic in a CNN interview and compared Davis to Martin Luther King Jr. last week on a radio show.
“You know Martin Luther King went to jail because he didn’t follow
the law,” he said. “There’s a long precedent in America from people
saying, ‘you know the law has to change to accommodate what is the right
thing to do, in their own moral judgment.’”
The right thing for Santorum is to pass a “First Amendment Defense
Act” that would accommodate “people who have very strong religious
beliefs that are antithetical to the ‘new law’ of the country,”
essentially allowing them to ignore the law.
Jindal defended Davis’ right to deny marriage licenses to same-sex couples, telling the Huffington Post
he doesn’t “think anyone should have to choose between following their
conscience and religious beliefs and giving up their job and facing
financial sanctions.”
George Takei has a better understanding of the Constitution than any of these people.
Leave it to George Takei to make this plain. In observing the ongoing
mess in Rowan County, Kentucky, Takei commented that, “she is entitled
to hold her religious beliefs, but not to impose those beliefs on
others.” He added:
Permitting a state employee to foist her religion upon others,
denying them a fundamental right as articulated by the U.S. Supreme
Court in Obergefell, would be to give government, through this agent,
the power to impose religious doctrine and viewpoint. That it cannot do.
Ms. Davis is in effect establishing religion by using her governmental
powers to impose her religious views.
Takei posted the following on his Facebook page:
Well
this is a bit of a circus. So let us be clear: This woman is no hero to
be celebrated. She broke her oath to uphold the Constitution and defied
a court order so she could deny government services to couples who are
legally entitled to be married. She is entitled to hold her religious
beliefs, but not to impose those beliefs on others. If she had denied
marriage certificates to an interracial couple, would people cheer her?
Would presidential candidates flock to her side? In our society, we obey
civil laws, not religious ones. To suggest otherwise is, simply put,
entirely un-American.
In response to Takei’s post, a Kim Davis supporter named Shawn replied with the following:
George, learn the first amendment.
Takei responded to Shawn with yet another brilliant civics lesson:
The
First Amendment has two clauses that are relevant here. One is the
Establishment Clause, and the other is the Prohibition Clause. Congress
may not prohibit free worship, and that is what so many claim, wrongly,
is being violated. But it is also not empowered to establish any
religion, nor to enact any laws favoring one religion over the other.
Permitting a state employee to foist her religion upon others, denying
them a fundamental right as articulated by the U.S. Supreme Court in
Obergefell, would be to give government, through this agent, the power
to impose religious doctrine and viewpoint. That it cannot do. Ms. Davis
is in effect establishing religion by using her governmental powers to
impose her religious views. I know the First Amendment, Shawn. Do you?
I agree with George Takei.
Unlike the faux bigotry claimed by Kim Davis and her supporters,
George Takei has had to deal with real bigotry for all of his life.
This bears repeating:
Ms. Davis
is in effect establishing religion by using her governmental powers to
impose her religious views.