Serial Anti-Catholic Bigots?

Bill Donohue offends yet again. Bill Donohue is a serial anti-atheist bigot. He offends me.

BILL MAHER OFFENDS YET AGAIN:

Bill Donohue comments on Bill Maher’s latest assault on decency:

When serial anti-Catholic bigots Bill Maher and Seth MacFarlane get together, it is a sure fire recipe for new lows in tastelessness. And that’s what we got on HBO last Friday night, as MacFarlane appeared on “Real Time with Bill Maher.”

“…you’re so lucky that you do cartoons,” Maher told the creator of Fox’s “Family Guy,” “because the things you get away with in cartoons—I’m so jealous of …”

Notice that Bill Maher offends with capital letters. He must be a MAJOR OFFENDER.

Using the phrase "serial anti-Catholic bigots" seems odd to me. It's kind of like bigotry in installments, sort of like bigotry that is turned off for awhile, until the next installment of bigotry comes along.

I think that Catholics have no right to judge others on decency. Can you say PRIESTS WHO RAPE CHILDREN!

It doesn't take much for Bill Donohue to be offended, but whenever he is, I feel a little bit more happy. Kudos to Bill Maher and Seth MacFarlane. And, I don't even like "Family Guy."

Dumbass Quote Of Note - Bill Donohue

"The whole purpose of marriage is to have a family. It's not about making people happy. It's not about love." - Bill Donohue

Where Is Bill Donohue When You Really Need Him?

From These religious clowns should scare you: GOP candidates’ gullible, lunatic faith is a massive character flaw by Jeffrey Tayler

(And where are all those annoying trigger-warning zealots when you need them? Why don’t they campaign to have the Bible stamped with “TRIGGER WARNING: contains multiple accounts of genocide, warfare, murder, enslavement, sexual abuse of women and underage girls, and ritual human and animal sacrifice”?)

Why is Bill Donohue more concerned with the evil secular humanists (especially their movies and TV shows that are way too sexy for him) than the evils of the Bible?

Bill likes to whip himself into a tizzy about evil secular humanists:

I've had it with mean-spirited secular activists out to turn our society and culture inside out and upside down. They will stop at nothing to smash our traditions, norms and values, making mince meat out of our Judeo-Christian heritage. Like termites, they eat away at the cultural edifice of our society. Some, perversely, are working to sabotage their own religion. They must be stopped because there is too much at stake. 

And of course the victim card must be played. Because this an important civil rights issue, because they say it is:

The Catholic League is the nation's largest Catholic civil rights organization. Founded in 1973 by the late Father Virgil C. Blum, S.J., the Catholic League defends the right of Catholics lay and clergy alike to participate in American public life without defamation or discrimination. It is led by its' President, William A. Donohue, Ph.D.

Get back to me on that defamation and discrimination thing after the United States elects an atheist president. Bill is immune to his own hypocrisy, isn't he? Oh the irony!

Witchcraft

Those fingers in my hair
That sly come hither stare
That strips my conscience bare
It’s witchcraft

And I’ve got no defense for it
The heat is too intense for it
What good would common sense for it do?

‘cause its witchcraft, wicked witchcraft
And although, I know, it's strictly taboo

From Pundits Slam Palin On Witchcraft:

Catholic League president Bill Donohue comments today on news reports that an African minister once asked God to protect Sarah Palin from witchcraft:

“In 2005, Sarah Palin went to church and found that a visiting minister from Kenya, Bishop Thomas Muthee, was doing the service. He offered a prayer asking Jesus to keep her free from ‘every form of witchcraft.’ Palin said nothing—she simply kept her head bowed throughout the blessing. Why this is newsworthy is one issue, but why it has quickly become the subject of scorn is another.

“For the past two decades, Americans have been lectured by educators and the chattering class that we must respect cultural, religious, racial and ethnic diversity. It seems that exceptions to the creed of multiculturalism are only made when it suits the ideological agenda of the left. Enter Keith Olbermann: He exploited this incident last night as a club to paint Palin as an extremist. Moreover, he used this single blessing to unfavorably contrast the African minister to Barack Obama’s spiritual mentor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright. The MSNBC commentator incredibly said that Wright—who spewed hate speech before Obama for 20 years—‘seems pretty mainstream’ by comparison.

“Witchcraft is a sad reality in many parts of Africa, resulting in scores of deaths in Kenya over the past two decades. Bishop Muthee’s blessing, then, was simply a reflection of his cultural understanding of evil. While others are not obliged to accept his interpretation, all can be expected to respect it. More than that—Muthee should be hailed for asking God to shield Palin from harmful forces, however they may be manifested. And for this he is mocked and Palin ridiculed?

“We know that many cultural elites have a hard time embracing religion, but is it too much to ask that they at least show some manners when discussing subjects which most Americans hold dear?”

Manners? In this case I think that “manners” = “shut the fuck up!”

God is not real. Witches are not real. No problem there.

People who think that God is real, are real. People who think that witches are real, are real. These people like to tell other people what is real. Lots of problems there.

What about all the people who are not “cultural elites” that have a hard time embracing religion? I guess we don’t have to show any manners.

What about idiots that have a hard time embracing the concept of the separation of church and state? I guess they don’t have to show any intelligence.

Crackers And Wafers And Rudeness, Oh My!

Some other bloggers, internetters, and unmentionables think that PZ Myers was rude or abusive to the Catholics because he “didn't accord the Eucharist proper respect.” Some think that he is a jerk. Some find his conduct reprehensible. Just what is the proper respect that an atheist should have for the Eucharist?

Here’s what Catholics believe about atheists like Mr. Myers and myself:

We will spend eternity burning in hell. They believe this just as much as they believe in transubstantiation.

How rude is that?

The god that the Catholics believe in is a fucking asshole.

How rude is that?

For a more sane perspective on all of this visit Majikthise.

The world would be a better place with no religion at all.

One Man's Body Of Christ Is Another Man's Frackin' Cracker

This is a long one. Father forgive me, for I know not what I do.

It seems to me that we have yet another case of faith versus reason, of religion versus science, of belief versus fact. Who will win this time? Whose side are you on? Will it cost a university biology teacher his job? I hope not.

Just how evolved are we? Not very, if PZ Myers loses his job over this.

From Communion wafer held 'hostage' raises holy heck by Paul Walsh:

A Minnesota university instructor and avowed atheist is jousting with a national Catholic watch dog group over a smuggled communion wafer, which the associate professor dismisses as a "frackin’ cracker."

Paul Z. Myers, who teaches biology at the University of Minnesota, Morris, on his blog this week expressed amazement that a Florida college student who briefly took a wafer "hostage" from a church ceremony has been receiving death threats for an action that was characterized "a hate crime" by the Catholic League.

Under the headline, "It’s a frackin’ cracker!" Myers wrote in an at-times profane blog entry: "Crazy Christian fanatics right here in our own country have been threatening to kill a young man over a cracker. This is insane."

"It is hard to think of anything more vile than to intentionally desecrate the Body of Christ," Catholic League President Bill Donohue said in a news release. "We look to those who have oversight responsibility to act quickly and decisively."

Read the rest here.

I would like to point out that Mr. Myers’s blog is called Pharyngula.

If there isn’t a term called “Universal Acceptance”, then there should be. (And give me the credit for coming up with it, if there isn’t.) I’ll give some examples, in order to define what I mean by Universal Acceptance. I would say that murder is universally accepted as being morally wrong and that people should be punished when they commit murder. Anyone disagree? No? That is Universal Acceptance. It is different from Majority Rule. Universal Acceptance stands the test of time, Majority Rule does not. Universal Acceptance always “wins” in the end, Majority Rule does not. Universal Acceptance is always right, Majority Rule can be right, but it can also be wrong. Slavery is an example of this difference. The earth being thought of as flat, but now being accepted as being round is another example. Universal Acceptance has truth on its side, Majority Rule does sometimes, but not always. Universal Acceptance can give power to minorities, Majority Rule does not. The Republic of the United States of America gives us a good example of this. Universal Acceptance is Republicans, Democrats, and Independents all believing in the Constitution together. Majority Rule is one of the parties electing a good or bad president. The Constitution endures, the president can be remembered (Lincoln or Washington) or fade away (Franklin Pierce). Universal Acceptance is the Constitution saying “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” Majority Rule is Christians thinking the United States is a Christian nation. Deciding who has committed a Universally Accepted as wrong murder is decided by Majority Rule (a jury), and that decision is sometimes right and sometime wrong. Science is Universally Accepted, religion is Majority Rule. Religion really is Majority Rule and not Universally Accepted, even though most religions claim they are a minority, and that they are persecuted. If religion truly was Universally Accepted, there would only be one religion and no atheists.

Although it may appear that they do, these statements do not contradict one another: “Universal Acceptance is always right.” “The earth being thought of as flat, but now accepted as being round is another example.” “Science is Universally Accepted, religion is Majority Rule.”

Even though scientists of the time thought that the world was flat, this belief was Majority Rule and not Universal Acceptance. Scientists can change their minds to suit the facts. Theists are not supposed to change their minds, and are supposed to ignore the facts. Universal Acceptance is dictated to by factual evidence, Majority Rule is dictated to by people who have been influenced by some combination of factual evidence, emotions and belief. I can’t think of how to say it better. (Please forgive this humble blogger.) The “some combination” means that any of the three could be set to zero, so to speak. For example, factual evidence does not need to be part of the equation. Majority Rule could be dictated to by people who have been influenced by emotions and belief without any factual evidence. Or by people who have been influenced by emotions only. And so on.

From IT'S A FRACKIN’ CRACKER! by PZ Myers:

So, what to do. I have an idea. Can anyone out there score me some consecrated communion wafers? There's no way I can personally get them — my local churches have stakes prepared for me, I'm sure — but if any of you would be willing to do what it takes to get me some, or even one, and mail it to me, I'll show you sacrilege, gladly, and with much fanfare. I won't be tempted to hold it hostage (no, not even if I have a choice between returning the Eucharist and watching Bill Donohue kick the pope in the balls, which would apparently be a more humane act than desecrating a goddamned cracker), but will instead treat it with profound disrespect and heinous cracker abuse, all photographed and presented here on the web. I shall do so joyfully and with laughter in my heart. If you can smuggle some out from under the armed guards and grim nuns hovering over your local communion ceremony, just write to me and I'll send you my home address.

Let’s assume that PZ Myers has gone ahead and done the deed.

I propose that PZ Myers is not desecrating the body of Christ in the form of a wafer. He does not believe in the body of Christ in the form of a wafer. Mr. Myers believes he is desecrating a wafer. Is that a crime? Now, you may point out that many Catholics believe the wafer IS the body of Christ and that Mr. Myers should respect that belief. Why? Jewish people do not believe that the wafer is the body of Christ. If Mr. Myers were to respect the beliefs of the Catholics in this instance, isn't that disrespectful to all Jewish people? (Let's not even consider any of those heretical atheists.) Buddhists do not believe it, either. Anyone from a non-Christian religion does not believe it. Only in the minds of Catholic believers is PZ Myers actually desecrating the body of Christ. For the rest of us the body of Christ decomposed a long time ago. Where do you draw the line?

I say it is time to call on a super hero. Let’s bring out our hero: Universal Acceptance. He is always right and knows just what to do.

Clearly this matter flunks the Universal Acceptance test. Why? Because I said so. I believe in Universal Acceptance. And I get to decide what’s right and what’s true. And I made it all up, just like the Catholics made up all the stuff they believe in. I'm only playing by their rules. Seems fair to me. If the Catholics can use the argument of belief, then why can’t I? And why can’t PZ Myers? He believes that the wafer is not the body of Christ. PZ Myers should get to keep his job, and Bill Donohue should shut the hell up. He has a right to believe what he chooses to, and so does PZ Myers. And they both have the right to talk about it, even though I just said Bill Donohue should shut the hell up. Let’s just stop all the death threats, job threats, and all other threats of any kind. OK? Except for crackers and other inanimate objects. Go ahead and threaten them all you want. (And if you want to insert a joke here about Bill Donohue being both crackers and an inanimate object, go right ahead. Just remember that I didn’t put that joke here. You did.)

But wait! There’s more!

I can think of many things that are more vile than desecrating the body of Christ. George W. Bush comes to mind immediately. A war criminal responsible for who knows how many senseless deaths. A war criminal who will probably never be punished until he arrives at that non-existent hell that he and Mr. Donohue like to believe in. (Like I said, he will probably never be punished.) What could possible be more vile than that? Then just round up the usual suspects: murder, rape, war, pedophilia, necrophilia, etc. Even vomit is more vile, for Christ’s sake.

Next I have a question for Mr. Donohue. (I already know his answer, and I think it’s a stupid answer. See if you can guess the answer and not win a prize.) How could anything that PZ Myers or Webster Cook do to your precious “body of Christ” be any more desecrating than placing this “body of Christ” in one’s mouth and causing this “body” to pass through the human digestive tract, then a toilet, finally ending up in a sewage system. And millions, if not billions, of Catholics do this every day. They have been doing this for a very long time, and unfortunately will probably continue to do this for a very long time. Over and over and over again. Talk about desecration! Talk about vile!

Some more questions for Mr. Donohue or anyone else who has seen the light. Why does an all-knowing, all-powerful god not tell his popes, cardinals, bishops, priests, brothers and sisters to just un-consecrate that little cracker that has fallen into the hands of someone like PZ Myers or Webster Cook? Then everyone could be happy. “He just desecrated a cracker. Ha ha. Good one, PZ.” God sure seems to like to leave Jesus hanging. Why does Jesus always get the short end of the stick? Or cross, or cracker, as it were. Help Jesus out here God, just tell the idiots to un-consecrate your son's body and turn him back into a cracker. Why do people choose to believe in an all-knowing, all-powerful god who seems to be so stupid and spiteful, someone who hates his own son so much? And again I know the answer to that one: “Mumbo jumbo, gibberish, and more mumbo jumbo, and don’t forget to put some money in the collection plate.”

Lastly, no religious people are allowed to criticize what I have written here. It is all true, factual, and correct. Because I believe that it is. That is all that you believers should need to know.

God, I’m tired.

Hungry too. I think I’ll go eat some crackers.