Thanks To Rush Limbaugh

Thanks to Rush Limbaugh I think I have this whole climate change thing figured out.

If you're like Rush and you don't believe anyone but yourself you can use Rush's technique and then claim it as your own.

The simplest way to understand climate change is to look out your window. That's it. If it is snowing, then climate change doesn't exist. Therefore it is only logical that if it is not snowing, then climate change does exist.

Here is an example. Today the midwest has blizzard conditions and has to deal with a storm named "Kayla". Therefore, for this area of the United States climate change is definitely real. Meanwhile for the citizens of Toronto, Canada, climate change is not real since it currently not snowing and the high temperature forecast for today is 41 degrees. And that is good old American degrees, not that weird foreign Celsius stuff.

It's nice, and so easy, being a simpleton.

Mr. Limbaugh, Please Help Me!!!

The sun is shining. I don't know what that means. I need Rush Limbaugh to tell me what to think. I trust Rush on this because he has no degree in any science field. I trust Rush because he has no college degree of any kind. I trust Rush because he is one of the one percent of scientists who do not believe in climate change. Oops, I forgot that he is not a scientist.

Help me Rush, please tell me what to think about climate change now that the sun is shining. I don't see any snow. What is going on?

Rush Limbaugh Is Fucking With My Mind

It's snowing outside. Climate change is a hoax.

Wait. It stopped snowing. Climate change is real.

Hold on, now it's raining. What does that mean?

Now it's snowing again. Climate change is a hoax.

Still snowing. Climate change is still a hoax.

It stopped snowing and the temperature is above freezing and all the snow has melted. Climate change is real.

It's snowing again. Climate change is a hoax... ad infinitum...

The End Of Snow? But It Snowed Once In NYC Herd Mentality

It all started about two years ago when the features editor at Powder magazine and the author of “Deep: The Story of Skiing and the Future of Snow” wrote an Opinion piece for the NYT. Porter Fox is not a scientist and the "End of Snow?" was more about being a skier and winter sports enthusiast than it was about climate change.

Enter Rush Limbaugh:

Here we have this major blizzard that has stormed the Northeast. Two years ago, the New York Times had a story in which they're serious about "the end of snow" because of climate change and global warming. At the time they wrote it, the key slopes were empty and bare -- or way, way, way below normal. And so (capitalizing and politicizing everything, which the New York Times does) it became a big story essentially saying that we're looking here at the end of snow.

Very soon, in the next 20 years, it could be the end of snow.

There might not be any more snow!

Well, which is absolutely flat-out ridiculous. It is worse than journalistic malpractice.

It was not a story, it was an opinion piece by someone who does not work at the NYT! The NYT was not "serious about 'the end of snow' because of climate change and global warming," Porter Fox was! How can this be "capitalizing and politicizing everything" on the part of the NYT? It was an opinion piece, from the paper that publishes David Brooks and Ross Douthat! How can an opinion piece written by someone who does not work at the NYT be "journalistic malpractice?" If someone tried to sue the NYT about this they would be laughed out of court. Why isn't Rush Limbaugh laughed off of the airwaves?

Then others jumped on The "End of Snow?" But It Snowed Once In NYC Herd Mentality bandwagon following Limbaugh's "leadership" of taking what Porter Fox wrote out of context and confusing him for a corporation.

Climate changers shocked and puzzled by snow in January and So Much for the End of Snow...

More will probably follow, even as the temperature rises and all the snow melts.

Also, Rush and his dittoheads are likely to continue to ignore what Porter Fox actually was writing about, things like:

Low Business for Snow Business as Ski Resorts Struggle This Winter

Warmer Winters Mean Higher Stakes for Ski Resorts

Smaller Ski Resorts Threatened By Warmer Winters

Warm weather pushing earnings downhill at area ski resorts

Warm Christmas Leaves Ski Slopes Stranded

Not everyone is thrilled with a warm December

I know, I know... Limbaugh is a "comedian" not a journalist. The thing is, he's not at all funny.

Will Rush Say He Was Wrong?

"The End of Snow?" Global Warming Scaremongers Predicted an End to the White Stuff Just Two Winters Ago:

RUSH: I saw the funniest thing over the weekend during show prep. When was this? It was on, I guess, Saturday. Here we have this major blizzard that has stormed the Northeast. Two years ago, the New York Times had a story in which they're serious about "the end of snow" because of climate change and global warming. At the time they wrote it, the key slopes were empty and bare -- or way, way, way below normal. And so (capitalizing and politicizing everything, which the New York Times does) it became a big story essentially saying that we're looking here at the end of snow.

Very soon, in the next 20 years, it could be the end of snow.

There might not be any more snow!

Well, which is absolutely flat-out ridiculous. It is worse than journalistic malpractice. It's just flat-out ridiculous.

As I write this it is 43 degrees in NYC, and it is raining. By Limbaugh's own logic this is proof of Global Warming and Climate Change and Rush owes us a retraction.