The other day David Brooks was on the Today Show saying the same thing he says in his column entitled The Long Defeat. On the Today Show he said more explicitly, than he does in his column, that Hillary should quit. By the way, he seemed to be very pleased with himself for coming up with the phrase “audacity of hopelessness.”
I think that if David Brooks thinks Hillary should quit, then she shouldn’t. Between Hillary and Barack, I’ll take Barack. Between Hillary and David, I’ll take Hillary. Why is Brooks so concerned about the Democrats all of a sudden? What is his ulterior motive?
Pamela Paul leaves the NYT
-
Several months ago I reported, based on articles from sources like New York
Magazine, that Pamala Paul, heterodox New York Times columnist was leaving
the ...
2 hours ago
0 comments - Post a comment :
Post a Comment