Why Sarah Palin And Not Meg Whitman?

I suppose the obvious answer is the lack of political experience. In all other ways doesn’t Meg Whitman seem like a more logical choice? Doesn’t she seem to be more intelligent and competent than Sarah Palin? (Don’t get me wrong. This doesn’t mean I like her political views.)

From Can Meg Whitman turn around California? by Therese Poletti:

Having been passed over as the running mate on the Republican presidential ticket, former eBay Inc. chief executive Meg Whitman seems to have now set her sights on the California state capitol.

Call it Meg 2.0.

Whitman has been increasingly active in the Republican party since retiring from eBay in January. She initially spent her time helping raise money for Mitt Romney, her former boss at Bain & Co., in his failed presidential campaign. More recently, she has been helping run Sen. John McCain's presidential bid. She was a contender for the VP slot before McCain selected Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.